L1s, perps, AI… they get all the hype, but without oracles, the whole thing collapses. Remember Mango and Venus getting oracle-manipulated and drained for multi millions in seconds? Even Aave had to freeze markets once when Chainlink paused updates mid-volatility. So back to basics, @BandProtocol’s oracle stack has had zero exploits and zero compromises. The tech edge is clear: – Sub-second, push-based updates (not pull-based lag) – Decentralized validator consensus with slashing for bad data – 40+ chains, 80+ partners, $441M secured In high-volatility cycles, you need real-time feeds that don’t lag, don’t freeze, and don’t misprice. Big names like Avax, Injective, Polkadot, Optimism… already rely on Band pricefeeds to stabilize DeFi activity. Without it, you risk cascades like we’ve seen when other oracles lag or get manipulated. What makes Band different? Multi-source validation, cluster-level redundancy, and APIs devs can actually build with without breaking the bank. Which got me thinking who should be #PoweredByBand next? → @zksync: scaling needs clean data and rollup security → @Berachain: primitives like PoL should plug into trusted oracles → @MorphoLabs: Band feeds could support high-frequency lending loops → @AevoXYZ, even @virtuals_io time to test some alternatives? What do y’all think? Nobody wants to see a billion-dollar protocol fail from a broken oracle. #PoweredByBand matters. if you're interested in using Band, get in touch with the team via