零点分析📈

Zero point analysis

997Following

1.5Kfollowers

Feed

$NVDA 【Pricing Wrinkles of On-Chain Mirrors】 NVDA pre-market contract: $213.45, the closing price of the underlying stock depends on whether it falls below the consensus of $1.5 trillion after tonight's earnings report. Nvidia's underlying stock has increased nearly 7 times in the past two years, and the on-chain perpetual contract has run 15,000 miles, with a discount of 3.2%. Breaking down the fundamentals of the underlying stock. The market expects Q1 revenue to be around $65.6 billion (up 67%), earnings per share of $1.50 (up 70%), and whether the gross margin can hold at 75%. Blackwell's progress, next quarter's forecast of a $71.7 billion target, and the gross margin bottom line are three ticking time bombs all set for tonight. Last week (as of 2026-04-29, inferred from the original text), Bank of America pointed out in a report that Nvidia faces two types of pressure: competition for market share from general-purpose chips like AMD, and the alternative routes of ASIC self-research from Broadcom, Google, and AWS. Prepayments of $95 billion, ecosystem investments, and 100+ software libraries are defensive walls, but not ironclad. Tokenizing NVDA is one of the deepest liquidity assets in the trillion-dollar on-chain US stock market. OKX launched over 20 stock perpetual swap contracts in March this year, with NVDA being one of the first underlying assets, leveraging 0.01-5 times, settled in USDT, without the need to open a securities account. The same series includes MU, SNDK, GOOGL, AAPL, MSFT, META, QQQ, SPY. As of early March, on-chain tokenized RWA surpassed $25 billion, nearly quadrupling from a year ago, with US stock tokenization soaring from less than $100 million to over $4 billion, a 40-fold increase. On-chain contract pricing includes two layers of discount. One is the varying discount of the asset's net asset value (NAV), with a persistent difference between the NVDA perpetual contract price and the pre-market trading price on Robinhood and the closing price of traditional brokers; the second is the liquidity discount, with perpetual contracts trading 78,000 units in 24 hours, about $7.87 million, while the underlying stock averages over $30 billion daily. Selling $30,000 incurs a slippage of 0.5% on the order book, with the price difference stabilizing at 0.5%-0.8%. Contract pricing does not account for dividends, and SE advertising voting rights have long been folded clean. The RWA track is still in the early stages of mining gold, with Nasdaq just approved for a pilot of tokenized securities trading, and the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission has allowed full-time trading of tokenized products in the secondary market, with traditional financial institutions speeding up their entry. However, the liquidity injection of this entire compliance system into the on-chain NVDA perpetual contract will require at least two quarters for the transmission cycle. Tonight's bet is to amplify leverage in the same direction as NVDA's earnings report. It is not about holding shares, but about margin daily settlement on on-chain synthetic products. There are no dividend rights or governance rights; the only value of holding is the priority of AI computing power development on the market index for the next quarter. If Q2 guidance reveals that Blackwell's shipments are hindered or the gross margin soft-lands, NVDA contracts may experience the same decline as the underlying stock over two days in a single day, and then rebound to fill the price difference in overseas trading in the early morning. The market has already priced in: · Bullish points: Blackwell accounted for 70% of data center computing revenue in Q1, inferring a comprehensive explosion in demand, with annual revenue breaking $215.9 billion and data center revenue at $62.3 billion. Coupled with Nasdaq's automatic inclusion and continuous sovereign AI orders, the computing contracts from Microsoft Cloud and Google Cloud can last for two years. If tonight's revenue exceeds $66 billion and Q2 guidance hits over $73 billion, the contract discount may instantly converge. · Unintelligible structure: The price-to-earnings ratio of the underlying stock exceeds any historical tech bubble, and tokenization has caused liquidity to diverge into two pools in the market. Who is bullish on the underlying stock, who is testing direction on-chain, and who has a higher stop-loss threshold? Nvidia's earnings expectations and the support of ultra-large contracts are solid, and all trading barriers have been folded away. The only unavoidable issue is the divergence between the track and the token: holding NVDA shares buys a global voting right for AI computing power; holding on-chain NVDA perpetuals buys a different level of leveraged bet, with the same price source, but a compliance trench and a deep liquidity pit separating the assets and rights. On-chain NVDA perpetual contracts are a futures expansion of US stock derivatives. Unlike traditional futures, there is no expiration date, but there is a daily funding rate. This subtle cost of 25-50 bps, combined with the friction of price differences on both sides of the market, causes perpetual products to naturally underperform underlying stock holders by 7%-10% on an annual basis. Pricing is not a computing power account; it is a time account. Prediction? Not needed. After tonight's earnings report lands, the excess volatility of NVDA perpetual contracts will simultaneously ferry both bulls and bears. About $7.87 million in liquidity cannot even support a single-sided test from a whale, while the pricing of on-chain perpetual contracts runs out a few hours ahead of the prices that will appear in tomorrow's market. The above is organized based on public information and personal analytical framework and does not constitute any investment advice. Cryptocurrency assets are highly volatile, and prices may fluctuate significantly or even go to zero. Please assess independently based on your financial situation, DYOR (Do Your Own Research). #LayerZero承诺超1万枚ETH支持Aave

3.78K

$ORCL 【500 billion black hole stands guard】 ORCL pre-market contract: $164.56, the underlying stock closed at $172 last night, a discount of 4.3%. I have been watching the traditional tech stock RWA track for a whole year, slicing the off-exchange bets in options into candlesticks, and ORCL's full circulation discount looks as beautiful as a seasonal luxury item. Breaking down the fundamentals of the underlying stock—— Cloud infrastructure grew 49% year-over-year, but overall revenue once missed expectations. Demand for traditional enterprise software continues to decelerate amid a full cloud migration, with SaaS revenue growth dropping to 13%, and traditional licensing business accelerating its collapse. Analyst consensus is clear, Guggenheim calls for $400, Wedbush gives $225, and Redburn is the only one to downgrade, stating that the market "seriously overestimates the value of Oracle's cloud contract revenue." $550 billion RPO sounds impressive, but when broken down, it consists entirely of large-scale long-term contracts that will only be delivered in three to fifteen years. Customers are buying computing capacity, not current earnings. This has little relation to the current profit and loss statement; Oracle must continuously invest $40 to $50 billion in real cash to build data centers to fulfill these contracts. The technical aspect has already broken down, with the MA200 at $213, and the current price is 22% away from the long-term average. The short-term MA support is shaky. OpenAI signed a $300 billion contract yesterday, one of the largest existing contracts for 2026. The RPO increase of 320% mainly relies on it. OpenAI's own revenue and user growth have not met expectations, and the customer structure has yet to form a perpetual business model; this deal still relies on a few large-scale customers to support valuation expectations. Just signed, it was interpreted as a negative by the market, dropping over 7% in pre-market, with funds voting with their feet. The underlying stock is currently around $173, with a pre-market contract discount of 4.3%. Daily turnover has dropped to 7,000 shares, and the bid-ask spread has pierced 0.6%, with market maker depth as thin as morning frost. The on-chain perpetual mechanism is fundamentally clean, moving the candlestick onto the chain through oracle price feeds, allowing customers to bet on the rise and fall of the underlying stock year-round. It does not involve stock custody, dividends, or voting rights; the underlying is merely a price index derivative shell. What you buy does not participate in the next round of quarterly capital allocation, and the votes cast on SnapShot have no legal effect; Oracle's rise and fall is just another type of crypto tool. Oracle's $500 billion contract reserve pool is already a floor negative, fully priced in by RPO expectations and capital expenditures. A 4.3% discount is not a mismatch; it is the market's full discount on the liquidity of Oracle's on-chain derivatives. I only look at one signal: whether OCI's actual quarterly revenue year-over-year growth can be sustained. Otherwise, the full circulation perpetual discount will only get larger. Hold the underlying stock and wait for work to start, hold the on-chain contract and wait for the underlying stock valuation to return to a reasonable range before making a choice. The above is organized based on public information and personal analytical framework and does not constitute any investment advice. Cryptocurrency assets are highly volatile, and prices may fluctuate significantly or even go to zero. Please make independent judgments based on your financial situation, DYOR (Do Your Own Research). #美伊走向长期封锁：外交窗口关闭

1.03K

$PLTR 【U.S. stock market benefits discounted on-chain】 PLTR pre-market contract: $140.55. What was the closing price of the underlying stock last night? Tens of thousands of retail investors are waiting for this candlestick to align, but they haven't waited. I've been watching the U.S. stock pre-market contracts for a quarter, and PLTR is a microcosm of perpetual equity contracts. The underlying stock has risen 480% in a year and a half, but the on-chain contract opened at a discount, with liquidity only 0.01% of the underlying stock. No fluff, let's break down the fundamentals of the underlying stock— 1. Q4 revenue of $1.41 billion, a 70% year-over-year increase, the fastest growth since its IPO; GAAP earnings per share of $0.24, compared to losses a year ago. Full-year revenue projected to reach $4.48 billion in 2025, with 2026 guidance raised to $7.18 billion—adding another $2 billion in revenue quarter-over-quarter. 97% of employees at a construction company use Foundry daily; AI is not an experiment, it's an operating system. Remaining Contract Value of $11.2 billion, a 105% year-over-year increase, with the floor for the next few quarters already laid down three layers deep. 2. The ecosystem binding is so deep that it can't be unwound. Stellantis just renewed a five-year contract, integrating Foundry and AIP into European factories; LG CNS signed a strategic partnership, embedding Palantir's FDE engineering team directly into a Korean group; Sumitomo Corporation integrated AIP into the oil supply chain, and Bain & Company is promoting AIP to global clients. The penetration of AI platforms in manufacturing and supply chains has no second-tier stepping stone to replicate besides Palantir. 3. The rhetoric from shorts is not about fundamentals, but about a 40x forward price-to-sales ratio and a 38x revenue valuation for 2027. Morgan Stanley and CICC both have a target price of $150, focusing on the bearish outlook. A 130% increase for the full year of 2025, and a 340% increase for 2024, everyone on the planet knows it's expensive, but institutional positions haven't dispersed. On-chain contract pricing is even more twisted. PLTR's spot closing price was $194.55, while the pre-market contract was discounted by nearly 28%. What users bought overnight was not equity, but a funding rate betting tool based on oracle price feeds. No dividends, no voting rights, no SEC protection; the underlying is just a leveraged futures contract. Daily trading volume of 7,000 units, and a single trade can crash the liquidity by 2%. The principle of perpetual stocks is very clean, using Pyth and Switchboard to bring Nasdaq candlesticks on-chain, where users bet on price direction with stablecoins. The logic is sound, but the reality is harsh. On the first day of Hyperliquid's launch, the perpetual contract market surged to nearly $100 million in trading volume, with open interest capped at $66 million, afraid to open the floodgates; it's not that people don't trust decentralization, but liquidity is so shallow that whales can reach the shore in just two steps. The position you bought in the underlying stock is snowballing amid unprecedented government AI orders and commercial adoption. The on-chain contract you bought is just another futures ticket betting on the volatility of the underlying stock, generating no shareholder rights overnight, not participating in the Q2 earnings season's capital allocation, and not even getting copied on Karp's management emails. Two worlds share the price source, but once you penetrate the underlying assets, they completely detach; this is the most twisted contradiction in the perpetual stock track. (The above is organized based on public information and personal analytical framework, and does not constitute any investment advice. Cryptocurrency assets are highly volatile, and prices may fluctuate significantly or even go to zero. Please assess your own financial situation independently, DYOR.) #鲍威尔4·29议息：任期收官之战

1.38K

$SNDK 【Storage Chip Mirror Chessboard】 SNDK: $1,065.75 The underlying stock has risen 2,808% in a year. On-chain contracts opened six hours ago, and the circulating supply increased by 6.89%. I’ve been switching back and forth between the US stock market and the crypto market, and I found that SNDK's underlying stock, USAR's permanent magnet, and the on-chain contracts are telling the same story, but the prices are in three dimensions. Data doesn’t lie; I’m looking directly at SNDK's underlying stock— 1. Yesterday's close was 1070.20, today it dropped 6% to 1002.35. The 52-week range is 33.13 to 1070.66, a 30-fold increase. 2. The price-to-earnings ratio is negative, with earnings per share at -7.26 and a market cap of $147.9 billion. The CFA model can't calculate this valuation. 3. The secondary underwriting price was $545, and in the next three trading days, it surged to 1070 before falling back. Western Digital replaced 5,821,135 shareholders with debt. Quarterly revenue is $3 billion, with a year-on-year increase of 61%. Evercore gave it an Outperform rating with a one-year average price target of $779 (range 252 to 1,044)— The real drivers of the profit and loss statement come from two things: NAND contract prices skyrocketing 50% in a single quarter, and data centers will replace mobile devices as the largest end market for NAND this year. AI workloads are filling storage demands, and all storage manufacturers are sharing the upside; SNDK is the one leveraging the story the most. A stronger support is compliance entry. On April 20, SNDK was officially included in the Nasdaq 100 index, and the $600 billion passive positions tracking this index are required to buy in. The largest semiconductor subsidy pool in the U.S., SNDK ranks high in the funding allocation sequence of the CHIPS Act. I went through the documents and realized there is a hidden industrial link between USAR orders and SNDK. On March 23, USAR reached a distribution agreement for neodymium-iron-boron permanent magnets with Arnold Magnetic. Chip manufacturing equipment heavily relies on neodymium-iron-boron permanent magnet capacity; USAR secured stable permanent magnet orders, while SNDK obtained licenses for wafer fab equipment upgrades. The more permanent magnet orders, the more stable SNDK's capacity ramp-up, both are tied to the same supply chain chair. Pre-market contract trends— On April 29, the opening price of the OKX perpetual SNDK contract was $23.26, up 2.92%, corresponding to a 2.3% discount liquidity of the underlying stock's market value. This is a standard tokenized mirror lock—don’t buy the underlying stock, buy a "lottery ticket for the rise and fall of SNDK at tonight's US stock market close." 5x leverage, SNDK's intraday volatility, completing two liquidations and then reversing within a day. Coinbase just announced the launch of SNDK perpetual contracts on the same day, intensifying competition. The three assets share the same business fundamentals, the same set of CHIPS subsidy expectations, and the same logic of domestic capacity driven by tariff policies. However, the OKX contract pricing is at a 2.3% discount compared to the underlying stock, and there is no direct arbitrage channel between USAR's stock price fluctuations and SNDK contracts—each market has independent friction pricing. Permanent magnet orders are real income, while CHIPS subsidy funds arrive slowly. The short-term buying power brought by the $600 billion index fund passive buying has already been partially exhausted in the increase from $545 to $1070. Two contract platforms are in a mixed battle, with interest rate spreads and liquidity dispersed; Western Digital's remaining 1.7 million shares have not been fully disposed of, and tail-end selling pressure still exists. The inclusion in NA100 has been completed, and the next catalyst will come from when the CHIPS funds actually arrive and the next quarter's data center shipment volume. I look at the most critical indicator: the storage industry's capacity utilization rate exceeding 90% simultaneously, and the global wafer fab's operating rate is the strongest cyclical signal. Before this, the underlying stock is around 1000, the contract is around $23, and USAR's three markets are trading their own pricing. The three assets share the same industry story, but the on-chain contract is just a low-cost version of a broker's K-line. Holding the underlying stock feels insecure, while the 5x leverage contract provides liquidity to the underlying stock through liquidation orders. The above is organized based on public information and personal analytical framework and does not constitute any investment advice. Cryptocurrency assets are highly volatile, and prices may fluctuate significantly or even go to zero. Please assess your financial situation independently, DYOR (Do Your Own Research). #马斯克vs奥特曼：$1300亿AI世纪庭审

1.6K

$USAR 【Rare Earth Permanent Magnet Betting Agreement】 USAR: $23.26 OKX has set up a pre-market casino Trading listed company orders not trading coins Contracts are T+0 delivery, which is a different matter from buying stocks on NASDAQ. Just launched perpetual contracts on Tuesday, with pre-market trading tags, betting on the price difference before and after the listing, with emotional leverage all rolled into futures contracts. The underlying asset has no cash flow, with a daily trading volume of $190,000. Stock pricing is unrelated to performance, purely based on the whims of the U.S. Department of Commerce in this betting agreement. USAR is working on the domestic rare earth magnet supply chain in the U.S., mining ore from Round Top in Texas and Pela Ema in Brazil, and building a magnet factory in Oklahoma. In January, they signed a $1.6 billion non-binding letter of intent with the Department of Commerce under the CHIPS Act, committing to buy 16.1 million shares for $277 million, plus $1.3 billion in loan warrants, causing the stock price to surge 30%. The money hasn't arrived yet, and Congress has started investigating conflicts of interest between the Secretary of Commerce and the company's stakeholders; if they can't come up with the money, it turns into a pre-sale mining machine, buying a bunch of rocks [6†L24-L38]. USAR has also included Brazil's Serra Verde in its basket, issuing new shares in exchange for mines, with a consideration of $2.8 billion, backed by multiple 15-year purchase agreements to support the price, doubling the scale of the mining site. Production lines and mining facilities are all under construction, with no revenue starting yet. Wall Street gives an average target price of $34, with guesses ranging from $19 to $47. This kind of forward pricing will only be realized when the CHIPS funds are fully collected and the mining site starts shipping, which could be four quarters to five years away. The financial fraud is not in the books, but in future income expectations. In 2025, cash outflow is projected at $86 million, with a loss of $297 million. The ideal scenario is $2.6 billion in revenue and $900 million in free cash flow by 2030, completing all three phases of facility production. The stock price's tenfold fluctuation over five years is all dependent on the progress of a one-time project acceptance, not quarterly financial reports. Stop the income illusion. USAR currently has no products, no revenue (pre-revenue), and the core technical indicators are the concrete pouring progress of the factory and government funding approvals. The greatest value of this collaboration with OKX is to provide a high-leverage front for betting on rare earth production capacity, extracting the endgame five years down the line to capitalize on intraday fluctuations. The above is organized based on public information and personal analytical framework and does not constitute any investment advice. Cryptocurrency assets are highly volatile, and prices may fluctuate significantly or even go to zero. Please assess your financial situation independently, DYOR. #鲍威尔4·29议息：任期收官之战

1.58K

$NMR 【The only profitable AI crypto protocol】 NMR: $8.96 JPMorgan invested $500 million Annualized fund return 25% Token price has retraced 90% from its peak I have been following Numerai for five years. All AI protocols are telling stories, but it has made money for four years. Global hedge funds are expected to have a net return of 25.45% in 2024, with a Sharpe ratio of 2.75, and only one month of losses. Traditional funds are failing, yet it continues to profit in a bear market. Data doesn't lie; I pulled up the charts— 1. Current price is $8.96, with a year-to-date low of $6.8 and a high of $14.2, bouncing up 30% from the low, still 90% away from the historical high of 160. Today's high is $9.06, low is $8.86, fluctuating 2% throughout the day, with a trading volume of $220,000, selling $10,000 can push it down. 2. MA5 to MA120 are all in the $8.9-$9.0 range, heated up. MACD is consolidating below water, RSI is stuck at 45—bulls have been posing for half a year, but there's no one in the audience. 3. Maximum supply is 11 million tokens, actively reduced from 21 million to 11 million. Circulating supply is about 8 million tokens, with 3 million locked until 2028. FDV is less than $100 million. Numerai's business model is very clean— 40,000 data scientists worldwide submit AI model predictions for the stock market weekly. By staking NMR, if the prediction is correct, they earn money; if wrong, NMR is burned. Numerai integrates these models into a meta-model for real trading, using profits to buy back NMR. JPMorgan has committed to invest $500 million, increasing the management scale from $60 million to $550 million. This year, NumerCon 2026 announced a buyback—within two weeks, it will buy 1 million NMR from the market, about $9.8 million. The protocol profits from buybacks, creating deflation. The fund is making money, the token is being burned, creating a closed-loop logic. The most twisted pricing paradox— Other AI projects in the same field have FDVs starting at a billion, while NMR, after full circulation and lock-up, is less than $100 million. Numerai is the only truly profitable AI crypto protocol, yet the market discounts it. This is because all value goes into the treasury, not the token. Holding NMR does not yield dividends; the only benefit is voting after staking. The value return path is through protocol profit buybacks, and the amount of buyback directly affects token scarcity; the mechanism exists, but execution is lacking. 2026 roadmap— On July 4, Atomic Staking will launch, supporting staking with USDC. The Numerai Predictive LLM is now live, an 800 million parameter model that reads news for signals. The Numerai Skills framework allows AI Agents to run automatically, and the MCP protocol enables Agents to submit models independently. The fund is transitioning from crowd-sourced predictions to a fully automated AI-driven hedge fund. Recent direct catalyst: JPMorgan's $500 million is gradually being put to use, and AUM may exceed $1 billion by the end of the year. The larger the management scale, the stronger the buyback capability. Risks: Token value capture is indirect. If the profit buyback amount is not large enough, the scarcity logic will not hold. Before the 3 million tokens unlock in 2028, supply-side pressure will always exist. All values are stuck below $9, and all positive factors are already on the table. The remaining uncertainty is whether the buyback scale can increase exponentially after AUM grows large enough. I only look at the buyback execution rate of the treasury and the quarterly growth rate of AUM. Before execution catches up, the price is likely to continue to fluctuate between $9 and $14. The above is organized based on public information and personal analytical framework, and does not constitute any investment advice. Crypto assets are highly volatile, and prices may fluctuate significantly or even go to zero. Please assess your own financial situation independently, DYOR. #鲍威尔4·29议息：任期收官之战

4.91K

$BAND 【Oracle's second pricing halved】 BAND: $0.2277 $180,000 in daily trading volume Not even enough to cover node operation costs I've been watching the oracle track for four years, Chainlink has taken 80% of the market, and BAND reigns in the Cosmos ecosystem, but the mainstream market only gives it a backup price. Data doesn't lie, I pulled up the charts— 1. Current price: 0.2277 All moving averages stick around 0.227-0.228 MA120 at 0.2269 Flattened out 2. High point: 0.2300 Low point: 0.2241 Daily fluctuation: 2.6% Trading volume: $180,000 Selling $10,000 can push it down by 1% 3. Circulation: 143 million Total supply: 148 million Almost fully unlocked Inflation: 7%-20% Used for staking 4. MACD underwater convergence RSI stuck at 48 It's dead After checking on-chain, I found that the BAND v3 mainnet has been launched, throughput has tripled, proof size reduced by 90%, just integrated with XRP Ledger and Monad. Router has become a data tunnel provider, Allora is using it for AI-driven projects, and just completed an upgrade proposal in April [3†L27-L31]. 40 blockchains, 11 data sources, 70 validation nodes, $422 million TVL, the ecosystem is being laid out at a decent pace. Market pricing logic is twisted. Oracles collect gas, BandChain settles with BAND, and protocol revenue is real. No buybacks, no burns, staking rewards come from inflation issuance, not profit sharing. Chainlink has captured all the mental market share of mainstream EVM chains, while BAND can only grab the preferred position on non-EVM chains. As the second place in the track, its valuation is always at a 50% discount. All the positives are already on the table. Technical upgrades, ecosystem integration, partnerships, all the cards that should be played are laid out. The price of $0.22 already does not include any expected premium, only reflecting the current situation of "daily request volume not breaking through." The negatives are also clear, no profit sharing, no buybacks, inflation dilutes the earnings of stakers. I only look at whether BandChain's daily request volume can double quarterly. Before breaking through, the $0.20-$0.25 range is the pricing floor for the second oracle, not hot enough to trade. BAND lacks technology, but what it lacks is the market's courage to pay a premium for being second. The above is organized based on public information and personal analytical framework, and does not constitute any investment advice. Cryptocurrency assets are highly volatile, and prices may fluctuate significantly or even go to zero. Please assess your own financial situation independently, DYOR (Do Your Own Research). #LayerZero承诺超1万枚ETH支持Aave

5.31K